Category Archives: Development Diary

Army Men Revolution, Army Men Toyverse project, Army Men: Major Malfunction, Army Men: Sarge's War, Characters, Development Diary, Making Of, Revolution story concept

Fixing and Expanding Sarge Hawk

March 12, 2026 Sarge Green Leave a comment

Analysis: “Fixing” Sarge Hawk and the Power of the Static Hero

The “Plastic Soldier Problem” (The Boy Scout Archetype)

Just like Captain America in 2011 on “The First Avenger”, Sarge Hawk carries the burden of “uniformity.” He is a character designed to be a pure instrument of duty. In the classic Sarge’s Heroes era, Sarge Hawk is the ultimate “Good Soldier”: he has no existential crises, he doesn’t question the Green Nation Army’s hierarchy, and his moral compass is as rigid as the plastic he’s molded from.

In a modern gaming and cinematic landscape that demands “broken” protagonists with dark pasts or ambiguous morals, a character like Sarge Hawk risks becoming irrelevant. If the world is gray, a hero who sees only “Green and Tan” appears naive. The common writer’s temptation is to “gritty him up”… make him cynical, ultra-violent, or a traitor. But as we learned from Steve Rogers, doing so destroys what makes him iconic. Sarge Hawk isn’t special because of his rifle; he’s special because he was a leader before he was a legend.

The Flat Character Arc: Sarge as the Moral Mirror

The key to making Sarge Hawk work in a sophisticated narrative isn’t for him to change, but for him to force the world to change. This is known as a Flat Character Arc.

In most stories, the protagonist starts with a “Lie” (a trauma or false belief) and the world beats them until they learn the “Truth”. But Sarge Hawk already possesses the Truth: sacrifice, loyalty to the squad, and protecting the weak (whether they are civilians in the Plastic World or refugee toys in the Real World).

Sarge Hawk doesn’t need a redemption arc. The conflict arises from his refusal to bend. When Sarge Hawk enters a corrupt environment (like the intrigues of Lord Malice or the betrayals of Brigitte Bleu or General Plastro), his moral immovability becomes his most dangerous weapon. He isn’t boring; he is terrifying to villains because they cannot buy him, they cannot tempt him, and they cannot break his spirit… (until Sarge’s War)

The Breaking Point: Sarge’s War and the Trap of Darkness

The game Army Men: Sarge’s War was the franchise’s attempt to enter the “mature era.” By eliminating his squad and his girlfriend, the narrative tried to give Sarge Hawk a positive or negative change arc: trauma. Here, Sarge Hawk stops being the mirror and starts being affected by the world.

This time, the key to Sarge’s War working within a sophisticated narrative isn’t for Hawk to change the world (as before)… but in this case, for him to be changed by the world. In theArmy Men Toyverse narrative, this marks the beginning of change. But not a definitive change that would establish him as a totally different character… rather, an evolution: He will remain the archetype of the Boy Scout, but within a complex narrative that leaves him no option but to act differently, Like when Batman and Superman are forced to kill someone. Although it’s something they avoid doing, circumstances sometimes compel them. But that doesn’t change them.

If we apply the Russo Brothers’ logic, this is Sarge Hawk’s “Winter Soldier” moment. Lord Malice’s attack isn’t just an act of war; it’s an attack on Sarge Hawk’s ideology. Lord Malice represents chaos and nihilism, while Sarge Hawk represents order and hope. The narrative challenge here isn’t to left the “vengeful” Sarge Hawk from Sarge’s War redefine the character and become from there on as dark as his enemy, but to see a post Sarge’s War and Major Malfunction version of Sarge Hawk who, despite losing everything, refuses to stop being the hopeful Boy Scout Green Soldier. The true victory in the Army Men Toyverse narrative isn’t avenging his comrades destroying Malice (and itself to become a villain) it’s that Sarge Hawk doesn’t become another Malice in the process by forever (But if at least for a time, as part of the growth process. Although the reasons for his temporary transformation into a villain may be partly due to external influence).

Sarge in the Toyverse: The Formidable Hero

To make Sarge Hawk work in a broader, more complex ecosystem like the Toyverse, he must be treated as a moral heavyweight.

Hawk during the assault on Dr. Madd Castle

Ideologically Dangerous:
In a world of conflicting factions, Sarge’s insistence on doing the right thing (regardless of brand borders or materials) makes him an anomaly. He isn’t just a soldier; he is a threat to any system that thrives on moral ambiguity.
The Catalyst for Change:
More cynical or pragmatic characters (like Brigitte Bleu or mercenaries from other “Worlds”) must find themselves transformed by interacting with him. Not because Sarge Hawk gives them a lecture, but because his example proves that a more principled way of life is possible, even in an endless war. Something like Goku transformed Vegeta by example.
The Introduction of Doubt:
For his flat arc to be compelling, Sarge Hawk must doubt. Not his values, but his ability to uphold them. “Is it worth fighting when my own generals are willing to sacrifice entire worlds for a plastic victory?” That doubt is what humanizes him without needing to “dirty” his character.

Conclusion: Goodness as Subversion

In conclusion, the way to “fix” or empower Sarge Hawk is to stop trying to make him “modern” through cynicism. In a landscape full of anti-heroes, a man who sincerely believes in duty and friendship is the most subversive thing imaginable. Furthermore, there will be no shortage of anti-heroes in this story…

Sarge Hawk is not a relic of the past; he is a warning for the present. If he stands firm while worlds (Prehistoric, Medieval, Space) collapse around him, he becomes the only stable point of reference. Sarge Hawk doesn’t change; he is the force that compels the Toyverse to decide which side of the line it wants to be on.

Army Men History, Army Men Revolution, Army Men Toyverse project, Army Men: Major Malfunction, Army Men: Sarge's War, Curiosities, Development Diary, Making Of, Reviews and opinion, Revolution story concept

Identity Under Fire

February 24, 2026 Omega Soldier Leave a comment

Change, Continuity, and the Fragility of Legacy in Long-Running Franchises

Every long-running franchise eventually faces the same moment: it must change or it must calcify.

Change invites backlash. Refusing to change invites irrelevance

What we are witnessing in contemporary media is not simply disagreement about creative direction. It is a deeper conflict over ownership of identity. Audiences who have lived with a franchise for decades often feel that they understand its essence — sometimes better than the creators currently steering it. When alterations arrive, the debate is rarely about a single character decision or plot twist. It is about the perceived erosion of core identity.

The question beneath the noise is simple and difficult:

What is the franchise?

Is it tone?
Is it characters?
Is it visual language?
Is it ideology?
Is it genre?
Is it emotional promise?

Most collapses happen when creators misidentify what the audience believes is sacred.

The Illusion of Surface Identity

One of the most common mistakes is confusing surface iconography with structural identity.

Logos, costumes, catchphrases, and legacy characters are visible markers. They are not the foundation. A franchise can preserve all recognizable elements and still feel alien if its internal logic changes.

Consider the tonal fracture that many fans felt in the Star Wars sequel trilogy beginning with The Last Jedi. The film was ambitious, visually confident, and thematically confrontational. For some, it deepened the saga. For others, it destabilized mythic structures that defined, particularly the treatment of legacy heroism and archetype continuity. The division was not primarily about plot mechanics. It was about philosophical tone. Was the saga fundamentally mythic optimism, or was it deconstructive introspection?

The iconography remained. The interpretive lens shifted.

When audiences feel that the interpretive lens has changed without permission, identity conflict begins.

When Change Feels Like Replacement

There is a difference between evolution and substitution.

Evolution preserves emotional DNA while allowing form to shift.
Substitution removes DNA and installs a new operating system.

The 2016 Ghostbusters reboot illustrates how tonal recalibration can fracture audience expectation. The original film balanced supernatural threat with grounded deadpan humor. The reboot leaned heavily into improvisational comedy and overt comedic energy. The issue for many viewers was not casting women or modernization alone… it was tonal displacement. The atmosphere shifted from dry absurdity inside a semi-serious paranormal framework to overt comedy driving the premise. The identity debate was not about representation. It was about tonal architecture.

When tonal architecture changes, audiences interpret it as identity erasure.

The Danger of Reactive Course Correction

A second trap emerges when backlash provokes overcorrection.

Following the Star Wars division around The Last Jedi, The Rise of Skywalker (the last sequel film) attempted to reconcile multiple factions of the audience simultaneously. The result, for many critics, felt structurally unstable: a narrative pulled in competing directions. In trying to restore perceived lost identity while also concluding a new arc, the film exposed how difficult it is to reverse philosophical shifts midstream.

Identity cannot be negotiated film by film without visible seams.

Consistency is not rigidity. But it does require internal conviction.

When Reinvention Works

Change is not inherently destructive. In many cases, reinvention has rescued or elevated franchises.

James Bond’s Casino Royale radically recalibrated the tone of the 007 series. It stripped away exaggerated gadget spectacle and reintroduced physical vulnerability, psychological interiority, and grounded brutality. Yet it preserved the essential pillars: espionage, sophistication, danger, and charisma. The aesthetic shifted; the emotional contract remained.

Similarly, Casino Royale redefined after the tonal excess of earlier entries. It did not replace the character’s moral framework. It intensified it. The darkness was not cosmetic… it was philosophical. Audiences accepted the shift because it felt like a deepening of identity rather than a rejection of it.

A more dramatic transformation occurred with God of War. The original series was operatic rage and mythological spectacle. The 2018 installment slowed the pace, introduced fatherhood as a thematic spine, and altered camera language entirely. Yet Kratos’ internal conflict (rage versus restraint) remained intact. The franchise matured without denying its past.

Reinvention succeeds when it reframes core identity rather than replacing it.

The Core Identity Principle

Franchises are not defined by plot events.
They are defined by emotional promises.

A western promises frontier morality and harsh landscapes.
A superhero saga promises mythic struggle and symbolic heroism.
A space opera promises scale and archetype.

When those promises shift, audiences feel betrayal… even if production quality improves.

Change must answer a central question:

What cannot be removed?

If removing an element collapses recognition at the thematic level, that element is structural.

Internet Amplification and Identity Policing

Modern discourse intensifies conflict because audiences now participate in identity negotiation publicly and constantly. Fandom spaces transform interpretation into battlegrounds. Canon becomes legal territory. Terms like “not real,” “not canon,” or “not my version” emerge as defensive strategies.

But identity is not static. It is sedimentary. Layers accumulate. Erasing previous layers destabilizes the base. Pretending previous layers never existed alienates long-term investment.

The most effective evolutions treat continuity as architecture, not obstacle.

How to Change a Franchise Effectively

1. Identify the Emotional Spine
Before altering tone, genre, or character roles, define what emotional response the franchise historically guarantees. Protect that spine.

2. Deepen Instead of Mock
Deconstruction must feel like expansion, not ridicule. Audiences tolerate darkness more easily than contempt.

3. Change Through Character, Not Around Them
Transformation should emerge from internal logic. Abrupt philosophical reversals without narrative groundwork feel imposed.

4. Preserve Internal Physics
Even in fantasy, rules matter. Breaking established mechanics to serve short-term spectacle damages trust.

5. Accept That Not All Audiences Will Follow
Every significant evolution sheds some viewers. Trying to satisfy mutually exclusive expectations often creates incoherence.

6. Commit
Half-measures are visible. If a franchise shifts direction, it must do so with clarity. Hesitation is louder than boldness.

The Paradox of Legacy

The longer a franchise exists, the heavier its accumulated identity becomes. Nostalgia freezes certain eras as definitive. New creators must decide whether they are curators, reformers, or revolutionaries.

Curators preserve.
Reformers refine.
Revolutionaries replace.

Conflict arises when revolution is marketed as preservation.

Audiences are remarkably open to change when it feels intentional, respectful of foundations, and internally coherent. They revolt when change feels cosmetic, opportunistic, or dismissive of what came before.

Identity is not fragile because it cannot evolve.
It is fragile because it is built from trust.

And once trust fractures, no amount of iconography can repair it.

Course Correction After Collapse

Repairing Tone, Continuity, and Trust in Army Men

There are moments in a franchise’s life that feel less like evolution and more like rupture. Not refinement. Not maturation. Rupture.

For Army Men, that rupture came in two waves.

First, the tonal detonation of Sarge’s War
Then, the structural dislocation of Major Malfunction.

Understanding how to move forward requires understanding precisely what happened. Not emotionally, but architecturally.

The Violent Turn

Sarge’s War did not simply darken the tone. It redefined the emotional contract.

Army Men had always balanced stylized warfare with plastic logic, battlefield stakes with accessible structure. Even at its most intense, it retained an underlying readability: units mattered, heroes mattered, continuity mattered.

Like an old-school cartoon or TV series, Army Men, before Sarge’s War, relied on a somewhat humorous, familiar and friendly foundation, despite the conflict and warlike tone, and the fact that they were basically toys. But its core was, above all, positivism. Its characters and the positive tone were everything. Those were happygames.

And yes… we all know that at the beginning Army Men was more darker, warlike and lacked characters with personality. But that changed when they released Sarge’s Heroes and the subsequent sequels, achieving a resounding and successful shift. But that’s a story for another time…

Sarge’s War chose trauma as foundation

It killed legacy characters.
It dismantled familiar dynamics.
It stripped away tonal elasticity.

The violence was not merely aesthetic… it was narrative erasure. Characters who functioned as structural anchors were removed. The emotional scaffolding that long-term fans relied on was shattered in a single installment.

Darkness is not inherently destructive. But sudden tonal acceleration without transitional architecture destabilizes identity.

The issue was not maturity.

It was dislocation.

The Soft Reboot That Wasn’t

Then came Major Malfunction.

Marketed implicitly as continuation, structurally it behaved closer to replacement. It attempted to move forward with partial continuity while altering context, dynamics, and character logic. It tried to inherit the aftermath without rebuilding the foundation.

Worse, it introduced continuity inconsistencies and lack of visual identity, that signaled something more dangerous than creative disagreement: loss of internal control.

Once a franchise appears unsure of its own history, audience trust degrades rapidly.

It is one thing to take risks.
It is another to appear directionless.

When tone fractures and continuity becomes unstable, a franchise does not merely decline. It becomes narratively radioactive. Creators fear touching it. Audiences hesitate to invest.

Army Men did not slowly fade. It entered suspension.

The Risk of Reversal

Now comes the difficult part: undoing.

Reversing large-scale narrative damage is one of the most dangerous operations in franchise design.

Risks include:

Perceived Retcon Weakness: If past events are erased cheaply, stakes collapse permanently.
Continuity Fatigue: Excessive explanation alienates casual audiences.
Emotional Undermining: If death is reversible without cost, sacrifice loses weight.
Nostalgia Regression: Attempting to “go back” without growth can feel creatively stagnant.

However, the alternative (leaving a fractured identity intact) guarantees stagnation of another kind.

The goal is not to pretend the rupture never happened.

The goal is to metabolize it.

Respecting the Damage

In the case of the Army Men Toyverse project, the commitment is clear:

Sarge’s War happened.
Major Malfunction happened.
Characters were lost.
The tone shifted violently.
Hawk became Major Malfunction.

These (and more) are not to be erased.

They are to be explained, contextualized, and integrated into a larger structural plan.

This is critical.

If the restoration feels like denial, it fails.
If it feels like revelation, it succeeds.

Revival Without Cheap Resurrection

Bringing back legacy heroes (includfing Vikki) must not be cosmetic. Resurrection in a toy universe cannot function like biological revival. It must obey the plastic logic of the Army Men Toyverse.

Plastic can be melted, recast, repaired, replicated.
But material memory matters.

Possible structural approaches include:

Recovery of preserved molds or casts.
Reconstruction from damaged fragments.
Plastic-world technological intervention.
Parallel-theater continuity explanation.
Psychological or identity-based restoration tied to casting lineage.

The key is permanence with consequence.

If a hero returns, they are not untouched. They carry fracture. They carry alteration. Their revival expands the mythology instead of negating prior stakes.

Death must remain real.
Return must require cost.

Restoring Hawk Without Erasing Major Malfunction

Hawk’s transformation into Major Malfunction is narratively powerful… not because it replaced him, but because it fractured him. But Hawk was already fracturing during Sarge’s War.

The correction is not to pretend that transformation never occurred.
The correction is to complete the arc.

If Major Malfunction represents corruption, mechanical interference, psychological break, or imposed alteration, then restoring Hawk must involve confrontation with that fragmentation.

Redemption arcs only work when they move forward through damage, not backward over it.

The return to “who he was” cannot be regression.
It must be integration.

Hawk restored… but aware.
Tempered.
Changed by what he became.

That preserves both: continuity and character weight.

Rebuilding Tone Through Expansion

One of the strongest advantages the Toyverse has is scale.

Instead of shrinking back to a pre-rupture state, the universe can expand outward:

New worlds.
New factions.
New ideological divisions.
New theaters of war.
New material sciences within plastic civilization.

Expansion reframes restoration as growth rather than retreat.

The return of legacy heroes becomes stabilization within a broader, richer world. Their presence anchors continuity while new elements push the franchise forward.

This is not rewinding.

It is restoring structural integrity and then building higher.

The Advantages of a Planned Restoration

Correcting a franchise after collapse offers unique creative opportunities:

1. Mythic Weight
A fractured era becomes historical trauma within the lore. That period gains meaning instead of embarrassment.

2. Emotional Catharsis
Reviving lost heroes with narrative legitimacy can feel earned rather than nostalgic.

3. Audience Trust Rebuilding
Clear, long-term planning signals confidence… the opposite of the instability that caused erosion.

4. Identity Clarification
The process forces articulation of what Army Men truly is at its core.

The Central Principle

You cannot undo a violent tonal shift by pretending it was a mistake.

You undo it by revealing that it was part of a larger arc.

Army Men does not need to deny Sarge’s War or Major Malfunction.
It needs to contextualize them.

The Toyverse must demonstrate:

The tone can be serious without being nihilistic.
Violence can exist without erasing legacy.
Darkness can deepen mythology instead of replacing it.
Continuity can be repaired without becoming fragile.

If executed with discipline, the restoration becomes one of the most powerful narrative arcs the franchise has ever had… not because it resets the board, but because it proves the board survived impact.

The goal is not to return to the past.

The goal is to reclaim identity (with scars intact) and move forward deliberately, leaving the destructive events as past events, somehow returning to normality.

Plastic breaks.

But it can also be reforged.

Army Men Revolution, Army Men Toyverse project, Development Diary, Making Of, Microverse, Revolution story concept

Plastic with Consequence: The dilemma of portraying toys as something serious

February 20, 2026 Sarge Green Leave a comment

Making a Living Toy Universe Feel Serious

There is an inherent contradiction at the heart of any world built from toys. Plastic soldiers, molded smiles, bright colors, simplified anatomy… these elements are culturally coded as harmless. They belong to childhood, to imagination, to play. The moment they move, speak, and wage war, the premise risks collapsing into a parody.

The solution is not to fight that contradiction. It is to weaponize it.

A serious toy universe does not deny that its characters are toys. It refuses to treat that fact as a joke.

The material is plastic. The conflict is not.

What creates seriousness is not realism in the biological sense, but consequence in the material sense. Plastic cracks. It splinters. It melts. It warps under heat. Like the real plastic, it does not bleed, yet it scars permanently. Damage is not only mere cosmetic. A gouge remains. A burn deforms. A limb once snapped does not regenerate unless rebuilt… and rebuilding changes the identity of the figure. Although they are toys, the conflicts (for them) are as dramatic, dystopian, chaotic, and emotional as the movie Saving Private Ryan.

On the other hand, the fact that the Army Men wonder where they come from and who made them, without knowing humans at first, gives the Toyverse a captivating air of mystery. They now know they are toys… but why they are alive?.

It is not satire. It is collision.

Violence, in this context, becomes strangely more disturbing than flesh-based violence. When a molded face designed to be eternally heroic is shattered, the dissonance is immediate. When a smiling infantry figure is left partially melted, its once-clean silhouette sagging and distorted, the visual contradiction does the emotional work. The horror is not gore. It is the corruption of permanence.

Imagine this scene, but with a plastic soldier half-melted by a flamethrower… same creepy disturbing effect

Childlike design placed in uncompromising situations generates a powerful, unsettling tone. A toy sculpted with simplified optimism (wide chest, bold stance, clean lines) suddenly reduced to fractured debris forces the audience to reconcile two incompatible readings at once. It is not satire. It is collision.

Plastic Irony

This is where irony becomes effective… not as humor, but as tension. The irony of a cheerful teddy bear functioning as a calculating war criminal. The irony of pastel-colored units enforcing brutal order. The irony of a soft plush antagonist whose stitched smile never changes while atrocities unfold around it. These contrasts destabilize expectation, and that destabilization produces seriousness.

Happy Three Friends is an example of this, or any bloody anime of 80′: They were a success because at the time nobody expected a cartoon to be bloody, let alone sexually suggestive with its portrayal of female sensuality. Even fewer expected important characters to die, as was the case with Optimus Prime at the end of Transformers G1.

If the world treats these characters as emotionally and politically real, the audience has no escape hatch. There is no wink to retreat into.

No escape

Violence, when used carefully, establishes stakes. It should not be constant spectacle. It should be sharp, visible, and transformative. A melted helmet fused to a figure’s head is not a shock moment… it is a reminder of vulnerability. A snapped arm replaced by a mismatched color limb tells history without exposition. The visual aftermath matters more than the impact itself.

The environment amplifies the tone

Scale must inspire awe rather than whimsy. A carpet is not “cute terrain”, it is an unstable fiber forest that swallows patrols. A kitchen counter is not a prop, it is a monolithic plateau of artificial stone. A staircase becomes a vertical siege campaign. When staging emphasizes height, depth, shadow, and mass, the toy scale dissolves. The audience stops thinking in centimeters and starts thinking in distance and danger.

Imposing scenography carries emotional weight. Strong silhouettes against vast domestic architecture. Harsh lighting cutting across molded surfaces. Smoke rising between oversized table legs like industrial pillars. When compositions are treated with the discipline of war cinema rather than children’s animation, tone shifts immediately.

Art direction is not decoration… it is argument

Color can function the same way. Bright, saturated plastic under cold, directional light becomes severe. Glossy surfaces reflecting firelight transform innocence into tension. A pristine green soldier under neutral light feels nostalgic. The same soldier half-shadowed, scratched, and standing before a towering appliance feels mythic.

Another essential choice is permanence

A toybox world often implies reset. Battles happen, figures are rearranged, and nothing truly changes. A serious universe cannot afford that elasticity. If a battalion is destroyed, its absence must be felt in later campaigns. If a faction loses territory, maps must shift. If a leader falls, instability must ripple outward. The sense that history accumulates (that nothing resets) converts play into chronology.

Even the concept of manufacturing can become existential. These beings are molded, cast, assembled. Does that define destiny? Is identity tied to batch, color, or purpose? Can a figure melted down and recast be considered the same individual? What does death mean in a world where bodies are objects? These questions deepen the premise beyond aesthetic novelty.

The greatest tonal risk is self-awareness. The moment a character reduces their own existence to a joke (“we’re just toys”) the illusion fractures. A serious toy universe must believe in itself completely. Its wars are not pretend. Its politics are not an elaborate game. Its casualties are not temporary.

The contrast between innocence of form and severity of action is not a gimmick. It is the foundation

A molded grin shattered by artillery. A plush villain issuing cold strategic commands. A bright plastic platoon silhouetted against a towering, indifferent world of human-scale architecture.

When handled with discipline, the visual language does the heavy lifting. The audience feels the weight without being told to.

In the end, seriousness does not come from making toys more realistic.

It comes from making consequences unavoidable.

Plastic is not fragile because it is a toy.
It is fragile because it can break… and once broken, it never returns to what it was.

Army Men Revolution, Army Men Toyverse project, Development Diary, Making Of, Portal Runner 2, Revolution story concept

Dev Diary: Portal Runner 2

November 22, 2024 GigaHawk c3 Leave a comment

Although the information about the project is classified so as not to reveal the story, what we can do is talk a little about the development process.

Using TEN Engine, a new updated Tomb Raider Level Editor, we are going to develop a second part of Portal Runner. With no need of more introduction, here we go with some of the development notes for future reference.

Tomb Engine test / Showcase:

During the presentation of the project idea with our collaborators, we made a demonstration of how it works and how to work in Tomb Engine (TEN)

In the graphics we can see the simple geometry of a stage, the texturing and then the lighting. None of this is a final product, just an early test.

Level Design:

In Portal Runner 2 we will visit new scenarios, but also several places and worlds already known, therefore we will imitate the designs of other games.

Level Textures:

We are going to extract and use textures from old games, to imitate the look and feel of those games. But there is a problem, at least with the textures of the Playstation 1 games, which are mostly 32px, while the old Tomb Raider ones are 24px (or 48px). Well, they are 8px X 4 = 32 and the TR ones are 8px X 3 = 24. That is, multiples of 4 when in TR they are multiples of 3, therefore they have to be converted to multiples of 4 without changing the appearance, because then when putting them next to other textures the image limits can noticeable.

3D Texture x32 — Army Men 3D Texture (x32)

3D Texture x24 (48) — Army Men 3D Texture (x32)

For now, the textures will remain as they were originally, but manually enhanced with the “nearest” resampling method. We will only add a few new variants. But as soon as we see that they work well, we may remaster them.